Which case is authority for the fact where the subject matter of a contract is of a quality different to that anticipated, the mistake will not be sufficient to render the contract void, unless both parties are mistaken and the mistake concerns the existence of some quality which makes the thing without the quality essentially different from the thing that it was believed to be?
Kings Norton Metal Co Ltd v Edridge, Merrett,& Co Ltd
—>> Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd [
K. Challaram and Sons Ltd. v. Messrs. Costain (West Africa ) Ltd
Shogun finance Ltd v Hudson
