PUL446
In Elemo & Ors V Omolade & Ors, the Supreme Court opined that the burden of proof has two common meanings. These are
Answer: establishing a case either by preponderance of evidence or proof beyond reasonable doubt
Standard of proof in civil cases is said to be: Answer: preponderance of evidence
In order to rely on secondary evidence of the content of a document, you must lay which following foundations.
Answer: both a & b
Where an accused person pleads an alibi, the burden of proof —
Answer: shifts to the accused person to prove his alibi
Standard of proof in criminal cases is said to be:
Answer: proof beyond reasonable doubt
Bernard is charged to court for for the offence of burglary. Bernard refused to take his plea nor give evidence. The court will only convict where;
Answer: the prosecution proves bemard’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
In corroboration, the test is:
Answer: whether there is an independent testimony which affects the accused by connecting him with the crime.
Standard of proof:
Answer: enhances the proof of cases in court
Titus is charged with receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. In other to convict him the prosecution must prove all but one of these ingredients
Answer: that he is reputed to be of bad character
Documentary evidence is NOT hearsay if;
Answer: it is tendered only as proof that the document was made at all.
Click here to follow on Twitter for your Free Exam Summary and free past questions
Whatsapp Chat: 08039407882 for your Project Writeup I Business Plan Writeup I Online Tutorial
